Halloween suggestion
about 2 hours ago
HUGEACKMAN
229 Total Respect
HUGEACKMAN
229 Respect
about 2 hours ago
Last Edited 25/10/2026, 18:43:39
Implement fairness measures listed above?
Log in to vote in this poll.
"Goodness is not goodness that seeks advantage. Good is good in the final hour, in the deepest pit, without hope, without witness, without reward. Virtue is only virtue in extremis."
Responses
about 2 hours ago
DAN
383 Total Respect
DAN
383 Respect
about 2 hours ago
It still won't remove the 'Paying for visits' idea. Trade chat will be steaming with them tomorrow.
about 2 hours ago
HUGEACKMAN
229 Total Respect
HUGEACKMAN
229 Respect
about 2 hours ago
It still won't remove the 'Paying for visits' idea. Trade chat will be steaming with them tomorrow.
DAN - 25/10/2026, 18:48:26
That's ok I think. Paying people for visits they would be taking a slight penalty on candy for money in that case. And it would also be minimal.
"Goodness is not goodness that seeks advantage. Good is good in the final hour, in the deepest pit, without hope, without witness, without reward. Virtue is only virtue in extremis."
about 2 hours ago
TOMETH
282 Total Respect
TOMETH
282 Respect
about 2 hours ago
Tbh, I didn't pay for much of anything. I got to top, because I earned a suit before anyone else.
Sure I then went on to buy the other suit at 350m, and another 125m for Joe's charm (it was an extra one, already had it). 250-300m was candy (150 I didn't need to pay for, only paid for it after trades were disabled, the idea was to give it back at end of event).
The rest of what I earned was just visits. So we'll over 1400-1500 candy. I only paid for the last little bit for decoration purposes. Which ultimately came from a lucky start.
Finally I don't think I should be invisible to players cause of the fact I have 3 decorations.
about 2 hours ago
DAN
383 Total Respect
DAN
383 Respect
about 2 hours ago
I would like the idea if maybe it defaulting to your 'Friends' and 'Cartel' first and then it's current order maybe? I don't know just talking out loud
about 2 hours ago
DAN
383 Total Respect
DAN
383 Respect
about 2 hours ago
Tbh, I didn't pay for much of anything. I got to top, because I earned a suit before anyone else.
Sure I then went on to buy the other suit at 350m, and another 125m for Joe's charm (it was an extra one, already had it). 250-300m was candy (150 I didn't need to pay for, only paid for it after trades were disabled, the idea was to give it back at end of event).
The rest of what I earned was just visits. So we'll over 1400-1500 candy. I only paid for the last little bit for decoration purposes. Which ultimately came from a lucky start.
Finally I don't think I should be invisible to players cause of the fact I have 3 decorations.
TOMETH - 25/10/2026, 19:07:50
I agree. It will get to the point where everyone will have Decoarations eventually anyway...
about 2 hours ago
HUGEACKMAN
229 Total Respect
HUGEACKMAN
229 Respect
about 2 hours ago
Another option would be making the randomizer limited. Like 3 or 4 uses per day? Something to think about
"Goodness is not goodness that seeks advantage. Good is good in the final hour, in the deepest pit, without hope, without witness, without reward. Virtue is only virtue in extremis."
about 2 hours ago
TOMETH
282 Total Respect
TOMETH
282 Respect
about 2 hours ago
Tbh, I didn't pay for much of anything. I got to top, because I earned a suit before anyone else.
Sure I then went on to buy the other suit at 350m, and another 125m for Joe's charm (it was an extra one, already had it). 250-300m was candy (150 I didn't need to pay for, only paid for it after trades were disabled, the idea was to give it back at end of event).
The rest of what I earned was just visits. So we'll over 1400-1500 candy. I only paid for the last little bit for decoration purposes. Which ultimately came from a lucky start.
Finally I don't think I should be invisible to players cause of the fact I have 3 decorations.
TOMETH - 25/10/2026, 19:07:50
I agree. It will get to the point where everyone will have Decoarations eventually anyway...
DAN - 25/10/2026, 19:09:22
Yes exactly.
Last Edited 25/10/2026, 19:15:24
34 minutes ago
VAELINN
1,109 Total Respect
VAELINN
1,109 Respect
34 minutes ago
Adding this to my queue, I will get some improvements in here.
I know there is a lot of people suggesting many things right now but one I have noticed that the people who are on the top page for trick or treat are at an advantage as well as people with cosmetics.
Firstly I think if a cosmetic is displayed the increased candy should only go to the person displaying. The other solution is make them invisible so players choosing houses can't choose them.
This gives players with money the advantage and if we are going the route of fairness and making candy untradeable (i voted yes for the record on it being traded) then we should go all the way fair here.
Another advantage is the one people on the top page of trick or treat houses. If we are going to be fair we should be fair here. Players who are not as popular, in smaller cartels, or keep to themselves alot, will be at a distinct disadvantage here.
My proposal for this is find a way to randomize the housing list when you visit town, OR I think the better idea is add a button at the top to visit a "random house" where an RNG picks what house you visit and if you receive candy from that house you have a 100% chance to get an extra 1-2 random candies.
If we're gonna be fair, let's be all the way fair no?
Thoughts?