The idea is simple: with a 300 energy limit, you could go 10 hours without plugging in, instead of the current 6 hours and 40 minutes, without wasting energy.

That would help people who sleep 8 hours to avoid wasting energy, and the extra 100 energy from daily charging would allow for greater activity.

people sleep 8/8+ hours?!

Almost no one I know, but I always read that this should be the norm 😊

Well, that would give more benefit for those who are less active vs those who dedicate themselves to be more active. And I don't see how this would increase activity...

You're right, it would benefit the less active users more, but I thought everyone would like to be able to spend more time offline without "wasting" energy, but I see I was wrong.

Regarding activity, I meant that with the energy recharge you'd get 300 instead of 200, meaning we'd all have 100 more energy to spend.

But it doesn't matter, it's clear the suggestion wasn't well-received, so if any moderator wants to delete this thread, that's fine.

I mean, increase recharge time to 5 mins would be, more often than not, the better suggestion. The 100/200 cap is fine.